An Improved Method of Rating Tuning Forks
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Tuning Forks and Tests
The three tuning forks generally used include : 256 Hz, 512 Hz, 1024 Hz. Most common being 512Hz. 512 because It has appropriate decay time, Less overtones and lies in speech frequency. Compressing the prongs with fingers produces around 70 dB sound and hitting against Knee or elbow 90dB. A prediction of air-bone gap can be made if tuning forks of 256, 512 and 1024 Hz are used. • Rinne test equ...
متن کاملAcoustic Analysis of Used Tuning Forks.
OBJECTIVE In this study, we evaluated used aluminum tuning forks (TFs) for fundamental frequencies (FF), overtones, and decay times. MATERIALS AND METHODS In total, 15 used (1 C1, 11 C2, and 3 C3) and 1 unused (C2) TFs were tuned, and the recorded sound data were analyzed using the Praat sound analysis program. RESULTS It was found that FFs of the recorded sounds produced by the used C2-TFs...
متن کاملRinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks.
OBJECTIVE (1) Determine whether tuning fork material (aluminum vs stainless steel) affects Rinne testing in the clinical assessment of conductive hearing loss (CHL). (2) Determine the relative acoustic and mechanical outputs of 512-Hz tuning forks made of aluminum and stainless steel. STUDY DESIGN Prospective, observational. SETTING Outpatient otology clinic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Fifty su...
متن کاملAn improved HPLC method for determination of colocynthin in colocynth
Background and objectives: Colocynthin is the major active secondary metabolite of colocynth, Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad, which has been used in traditional and ethno medicine of many countries. It could be considered as an active marker for quality control of colocynth and its herbal products. Analysis and standardization of colocynth and its herbal preparations are a critical...
متن کاملRating through Voting: An Iterative Method for Robust Rating
In this paper we introduce an iterative voting algorithm and then use it to obtain a rating method which is very robust against collusion attacks as well as random and biased raters. Unlike the previous iterative methods, our method is not based on comparing submitted evaluations to an approximation of the final rating scores, and it entirely decouples credibility assessment of the cast evaluat...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Physical Review (Series I)
سال: 1901
ISSN: 1536-6065
DOI: 10.1103/physrevseriesi.12.279